home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / lang / c-part2 / 15052 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  944 b 
  1. Path: news.interpath.net!softbase
  2. From: softbase@mercury.interpath.com (Scott McMahan - Softbase Systems)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
  4. Subject: Re: Differences: Turbo vs. Microsoft
  5. Date: 16 Apr 1996 22:56:05 GMT
  6. Organization: Interpath -- Providing Internet access to North Carolina
  7. Message-ID: <4l18i5$9sj@news.interpath.net>
  8. References: <1996Apr15.172003.140044@forest> <16APR199607502310@erich.triumf.ca> <danpop.829677541@news.cern.ch>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.interpath.com
  10. X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
  11.  
  12. Dan Pop (danpop@mail.cern.ch) wrote:
  13. : And to really answer the question of the original poster: there is no
  14. : difference between the C that's in Turbo C and the C that's in
  15. : Microsoft C.
  16.  
  17. None whatsoever? They both implement ANSI C identically?
  18.  
  19. I've never pored over the ANSI C implementation documentation for
  20. both compilers side by side, but there's bound to be some differences.
  21. Normal code shouldn't run into them.
  22.  
  23. Scott
  24.  
  25.  
  26.